The EU deserves the Nobel for democracy push
Gwynne Dyer says the list of recent winners makes clear the Peace Prize is a misnomer today
Maybe they gave the Nobel Peace Prize to the European Union because they couldn't think of anybody else. Nelson Mandela already has one. So does Aung San Suu Kyi. Even Barack Obama has one, though what for is not exactly clear. So who's left? We'll just give it to the EU. Nobody will notice that.
But they did notice, and some of them were not amused. "A Nobel prize for the EU at a time Brussels and all of Europe is collapsing in misery? What next? An Oscar for [European Council president Herman] Van Rompuy?" asked Geert Wilders, the Dutch Eurosceptic.
And France's newspaper asked: "But who will go to Oslo for the EU to receive the Nobel Peace Prize? As trivial as it may seem, the question raises [the legitimacy] of an entity … whose institutional stops and starts and lack of democratic representation are regularly criticised."
The EU was an elite project from the start, and policy for the 27-member union is still set mostly by politicians and officials, not citizens.
However, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. The original purpose of the Nobel Peace Prize was to honour people who worked to put an end to the terrible wars that have repeatedly devastated the European continent (and much of the rest of the world as well). The EU has made a major contribution to that task, but that is not its greatest achievement.
The great virtue of the EU, despite its "democratic deficit" at the Brussels level, is that its member countries must be fully democratic, relatively uncorrupt and fully observant of civil and human rights. Not only has this prevented some members from backsliding into intolerance and authoritarianism in times of great stress; it has also been a huge incentive for prospective members to clean up their act.
