Advertisement

Locustland | Failed police manhunt for Changchun baby murderer brings CCTV surveillance under fire

With vast sums of taxpayer money used to fund construction of the city's costly 'eye-in-the-sky' video surveillance network, netizens want to know why it was useless in the manhunt.

Reading Time:1 minute
Why you can trust SCMP
Caijing photo of police guarding a billboard announcing the launch of phase 2 construction of Changchun's "Skynet".
After 3,500 cops were unable to find either Zhou Xijun, the vehicle he stole or the baby he murdered during a 40-hour citywide manhunt in Changchun earlier this week, public anger has turned toward the city's costly and apparently somewhat useless network of CCTV surveillance cameras.
Advertisement
Borrowing a quote from a slamming article published by Caijing yesterday, writer Xu Shaolin asks:
Changchun spent 140 million yuan [HK$174.6 million] on building its fiery eye-in-the-sky project - a blind eye, as it turned out in this case. Netizens want to know: If the vehicle was stolen around 7am and driven to Gongzhuling by just after 8am, with a few thousand police searching blindly in the city, the car recovered only after a citizen found it and called police, and with a suspect who turned himself in, where was the so-called eye-in-the-sky during all this? It catches almost everyone who runs a red light, so does the eye only see when used against the public it should instead be protecting? 

According to Xinhua, China Unicom won the contract to build phase 2 of Changchun's "skynet", designed to provide blanket surveillance of the city with cameras in every building and at every intersection.

Construction began in August 2010 with a timeline of three years, and at present 58,000 of the network's eventual total of 60,000 cameras - some of which, Caijing writes, were provided by equipment manufacturer ZTE, are in operation.

Advertisement