Numbers aside, China is not yet a trading powerhouse

Last year, China ostensibly reached another milestone in its meteoric rise, surpassing the United States to become the world's largest trading country, with its total trade turnover valued at 25.83 trillion yuan (HK$32.5 trillion). But this achievement is largely illusory - and should not be allowed to obscure China's need to transform its trading model.

Since the 1990s, China has been building up its "processing trade" - whereby it imports intermediate inputs from other countries, processes or assembles them, then exports them - causing the ratio of intermediate-product trade to overall external trade to grow rapidly. Given that traditional trade accounting is based on country of origin, the resulting global segmentation of value added and the multilayered international division of labour can distort trade figures.

For example, China's trade model - whereby it imports significant quantities of intermediate inputs from East Asian countries like Japan and South Korea, then exports the assembled products to the US - allows for substantial redundancy in trade records. In 2010, more than one-quarter of the world's US$19 trillion in exports was counted more than once.

China's dependence on low-value-added activities like processing and assembly is rooted in its historical lack of capacity to invest in research and development. For a long time, the country was able to overcome this deficiency by capitalising on its abundant labour force to become a global leader in low-cost, labour-intensive manufacturing.

But China's low-cost advantage in manufacturing is diminishing rapidly, owing to rising wages and a declining demographic dividend. And its low position in global value chains means that its actual profits on exports remain far lower than those of advanced countries like the US, which specialises in high-technology, high-value-added production.