Advertisement

‘Key man risk’ is still rife in Chinese companies, as shown by the US$4.2 billion wipeout in value of Future Land after founder’s arrest in Shanghai

  • Latest scandal shows how investors end up paying a heavy price for the mistakes committed by company executives
  • About 13 per cent of listed Chinese businesses, or close to 400 companies, have a shareholder who owns a stake of 50 per cent or more, according to data compiled by Bloomberg

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Wang Zhenhua, chairman of Future Land Development Holdings, briefs the media on their global offering press conference, in Hong Kong on November 18, 2012. Photo: Edward Wong
Zheng Yangpengin Beijing

The latest scandal from the mainland, this time involving the billionaire chairman of Chinese developer Future Land Development Holdings, has once again brought into focus “key man risk”.

Advertisement

Investors are reeling from the shock arrest of Wang Zhenhua, one of China’s richest men and controlling stakeholder of Hong Kong-listed Future Land, for allegedly molesting a nine-year-old girl. It wiped out more than HK$33 billion (US$4.2 billion) from the company’s market cap since the arrest was confirmed by Shanghai police on Wednesday.

The development has sent also the company’s bonds plunging, and prompted Moody’s, S&P Global Ratings and Fitch to place it on negative credit watch on Friday to reflect the potential damage to its reputation.

The scandal is reminiscent of a slew of incidents where the downfall of Chinese executives synonymous with their companies has badly hurt the company.

Investors of China’s second largest e-commerce player JD.com were burnt when its founder Richard Liu Qiangdong was arrested in the US last fall on a rape allegation, causing JD.com’s shares to plunge. Guo Guangchang, the founder and chairman of Fosun Group, famously caused a scare in 2017 when he was out of reach for several hours – he said he was flying to Shanghai from Xi’an – and his stock price plunged. The Chinese securities regulator eventually slapped a 200,000 yuan (US$30,750) fine on Zhejiang-based Hithink for spreading misleading market-sensitive information about Guo’s whereabouts.
Advertisement
Advertisement