Hong Kong companies say HKEX is ‘micromanaging’ in its fix for overboarding, governance
- Adding a hard cap on the number of directorships one can take does not improve their work, said the Chamber of Hong Kong Listed Companies
Hong Kong’s publicly traded companies have come out to “strongly oppose” the plan by the city’s stock exchange to cap the number of board seats each independent director can take, and limit the duration of their tenure.
“A hard cap on the number of directorships does not [ensure] better [performance],” said Mike Wong Ming-wai, chief executive of the Chamber of Hong Kong Listed Companies, whose members include Sun Hung Kai Properties, Henderson Land and most of the largest companies on the Hong Kong exchange.
“A director may take on many directorships but can still contribute sufficient time and effort to serve,” Wong said in an interview with the Post. “It boils down to the integrity and discipline of the individuals. Directors are well aware of their duties and the consequences of failing them.”
Hong Kong has lagged behind other stock exchanges in tackling its “overboarding” problem. In Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen, concurrent INED positions are capped at three. The London bourse limits full-time executive directors to one board seat in a FTSE 100 company.